Fear, sovereignty and the right to die

Hardes, J. (2013) Fear, sovereignty and the right to die. Societies, 3. pp. 66-79. ISSN 2075-4698.

[img]
Preview
PDF
13403.pdf

Download (104kB)

Abstract

This paper addresses the “right to die” through the lens of Derrida’s The Beast and the Sovereign, Volume One. Specifically focusing on the case of Tony Nicklinson v. Ministry of Justice, 2012, the essay posits two things. First, Derrida’s insight helps us understand how a “fear of death” is a fundamental performative feature of sovereignty politics. Second, in order to maintain its performative role, sovereignty must perpetuate the belief that “man is wolf to man.” I argue that, in right-to-die cases, this has the effect of precluding compassionate reasons for taking the life of another. Thus, I posit that these two points, in part, explain how right-to-die cases fail on appeal. All is not lost, however, as this essay advances Derrida’s position that these performative workings of sovereignty, which currently preclude the right to die, are entirely deconstructable. As such, exploring how right-to-die cases are articulated in law permits a deconstruction of sovereignty politics and allows us to open up other ways of thinking about the relation between sovereignty, life, death, and our relationships with “others”.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
J Political Science > JC Political theory
K Law > K Law (General)
K Law > KD Law of the United Kingdom and Ireland
Divisions: Faculty of Education
Depositing User: Dr Jennifer Hardes
Date Deposited: 19 May 2015 14:04
Last Modified: 25 Jan 2016 23:34
URI: https://create.canterbury.ac.uk/id/eprint/13403

Actions (login required)

Update Item (CReaTE staff only) Update Item (CReaTE staff only)

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Share

Connect with us

Last edited: 29/06/2016 12:23:00